EVALUATION STANDARDS

Editorial Policy & Review Standards

Our comprehensive 6-stage testing framework, clinical fact-checking process, and strict editorial integrity standards.

Continuous Quality Assurance • Reviewed September 2026

Our Editorial Commitment

At NutraSift, we believe every consumer deserves clear, scientifically verified, and unbiased health information. We adhere to the highest journalistic and scientific integrity standards to ensure our reviews remain trustworthy, accurate, and completely free from advertiser influence.

1. Our 6-Stage Supplement Evaluation Workflow

Before any health product or dietary supplement is assigned a rating score on NutraSift, it must successfully pass our rigorous six-tier evaluation protocol:

01
Ingredient Label Audit

We inspect the full Supplement Facts panel, noting exact milligrams of active compounds, identifying proprietary blend ratios, and verifying that ingredients are in bioavailable forms.

02
Clinical Literature Cross-Reference

We search peer-reviewed biomedical research (PubMed, NCBI, Cochrane) to verify whether clinical dosages in published human trials match the product's actual serving size.

03
Manufacturing & Purity Certification

We investigate whether the supplement is produced in an FDA-registered, cGMP-certified facility in the USA, and verify the presence of third-party ISO lab testing for heavy metals and purity.

04
Safety, Stimulant & Allergen Screening

We screen for dangerous hidden synthetic stimulants, undisclosed binders, artificial coloring dyes, gluten, soy, dairy, or potential prescription medication contraindications.

05
Independent Consumer Feedback Synthesis

We aggregate and analyze thousands of verified purchaser reviews across independent forums, Trustpilot, and BBB, actively detecting and stripping out bot-generated testimonials.

06
Value, Pricing & Refund Policy Verification

We calculate the true cost per active serving and test the manufacturer's money-back refund guarantee policy for transparency and ease of return.

2. Editorial Independence & Commercial Separation

Our editorial team and clinical writers operate completely independent of advertising, sales, and affiliate marketing departments.

  • No Paid Reviews: We do not accept sponsored posts, paid product placements, or monetary incentives to write favorable reviews.
  • No Brand Pre-Approvals: Supplement manufacturers are never given preview access to our reviews prior to publication, nor can they veto our ratings.
  • Zero Commission Influence: If a product fails our clinical standards, it receives a low rating, regardless of potential affiliate revenue.

3. Fact-Checking & Primary Scientific Sources

Every health claim made in our articles is supported by high-quality primary scientific literature. We prioritize:

  • Peer-reviewed human clinical trials (randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled).
  • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses from established scientific journals.
  • Official guidance from health agencies (FDA, NIH, CDC, WHO, EFSA).

4. Corrections & Continuous Maintenance Policy

We are committed to total accuracy. When an error is identified, or when a brand releases a new formula iteration, our editorial team immediately updates the content with a timestamped modification notice.

If you notice an inaccuracy, an outdated study citation, or a changed product formula, please alert our editorial desk via our Contact Page for review.

Submit an Editorial Inquiry or Feedback

Our editorial board welcomes feedback from medical practitioners, researchers, and consumers.

Contact Editorial Board